Iona Institute Survey On Child Abuse

The Iona Institute has released the results of a recent survey in which they have discovered that Irish people have overestimated the extent of the child abuse problem with regard to priests. 

The much ignored SAVI Report (an independent report into child abuse conducted by the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre) tells us that about 3% of those who have been abused have been abused by priests/clerics/religious.  It contrasts with the perceptions of many Irish people, and indeed with the amount of coverage the media have given to child abuse in the Church - the bigger problem in society tends to be ignored. 

Here is a copy of the press release from the Iona Institute, thanks to them for sending it to me.

Majority of public overestimates number of priests who are guilty of child abuse

Seven in ten overestimate prevalence of abusers among the Catholic clergy

One in four believe that 40pc or more of all priests have abused a child

November 1, 2011- A CLEAR majority of the public overestimate the number of Catholic clergy who are guilty of child abuse, a new Amarach Research poll commissioned by The Iona Institute reveals.

The most authoritative estimate to date, conducted in the United States, puts the true number of accused priests at 4 percent. (See note three below).

However, seven out of every ten respondents believe the number is higher than this and 42 per cent put the number above 20 percent. Of these, 27 percent believe the number exceeds 40 percent, and 17 percent put it at half or more.

Five percent of the public believe that between 90 percent and 100 percent of all Catholic priests are guilty of child abuse. (For a fuller breakdown of the figures see note four below).

Therefore, close to half of the public are overestimating the number of guilty priests by a factor of at least five to one.

The findings of The Iona Institute poll are similar to those of a poll commissioned on this subject by the Royal College of Surgeons in 2002, although a higher percentage of the public are now grossly overestimating the number of priests who are guilty of child abuse.

The Royal College poll found that 11pc of the public believed that more than half of priests are guilty of child abuse. This latest poll, as mentioned, found that 17 percent of the public today put it at more than half.

Commenting on the findings on behalf of The Iona Institute, Professor Patricia Casey said: “There has been very deep and completely justified public anger over the scandal of child sex abuse by clergy. However, only a small minority of priests are guilty of this terrible crime and in the interests of justice, and in fairness to the vast majority of priests, it is essential that fact this becomes universally known among the public at large”.

Professor Casey continued: “It might be understandable if the public were overestimating the number of guilty priests by a factor of two or so, but the fact that so many members of the public are grossly overestimating the number of guilty priests should be a matter of deep concern to all fair-minded people.

“It could be claimed that the fact for this overestimation lies exclusively with the Church. However, as a normal rule when responsible media outlets are reporting crimes by certain groups such as Travellers or Muslims, great care is taken not to stereotype or demonise these groups.

“For example, when terrorist atrocities are committed in the name of Islam, responsible media point out that only a tiny minority of Muslims are guilty of these atrocities, and that such terrorist attacks are an aberration in Muslim terms, rather than a true expression of Islam”.

She concluded: “Therefore, when cases of clerical abuse are being reported, a similarly responsible attitude should be adopted, that is, the cases should be factually and objectively covered, but it should be made clear each and every time that only a very small minority of Catholic priests are guilty of child abuse”.

          ENDS
        Notes to Editor

1.      The Iona Institute is a pro-religion organisation.
2.      These findings are based on a nationwide survey of 1,000 Irish people in September using the Amárach Research omnibus service.
3.      According to the most authoritative study on the topic, conducted by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in the United States, four percent of priests in the US had one or more allegations of child abuse made against them in the period 1950 to 2002. The abuse scandals peaked between 1975 and 1985. The study is called ‘The Nature and Scope of the Problem of Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic Priests and Deacons in the United States’. No comparable study has been done of any other organisation anywhere in the world. The variation between US dioceses averaged at between 3-6%.
4.      Thirty one percent of respondents put the number of abusers at 5% or less. Another 14% put it at 6 to 10%; 13% put it at 11 to 20%; 10% at 21 to 30%; 5% at 31 to 40%; 10% at 41 to 50%; 4% at 51 to 60%; 3% at 61 to 70%; 4% at 71 to 80%; 1% at 81 to 90% and 5% at 91 to 100%.

Coverage of the findings in today's newspapers: The Irish Examiner, The Irish Independent, The Irish Times, Yahoo! news also has an article, note they put 'overestimated' in inverted commas - they should read the SAVI Report.   The Belfast Telegraph does the same in its article.  So should the last 5% who think that 91-100% of priests are child abusers.   

The Iona Institute does great work and is worthy of support.  They get a lot of flack because they make public the news a lot of people do not want to hear.  They tend to be unpopular with both the media and members of the hierarchy, but they do a great service to society and the Church.  So, if you have a few euro/pounds/dollars to spare, you could do worse than send them a donation to help them in their work.  Link to their website here.