Dr Janet Smith has an excellent article on the recent controversy in Catholic World Report. It would be a good idea to read the whole article, but here is the important bit:
We must note that the example that Pope Benedict gives for the use of a condom is a male prostitute; thus, it is reasonable to assume that he is referring to a male prostitute engaged in homosexual acts. The Holy Father is simply observing that for some homosexual prostitutes the use of a condom may indicate an awakening of a moral sense; an awakening that sexual pleasure is not the highest value, but that we must take care that we harm no one with our choices. He is not speaking to the morality of the use of a condom, but to something that may be true about the psychological state of those who use them. If such individuals are using condoms to avoid harming another, they may eventually realize that sexual acts between members of the same sex are inherently harmful since they are not in accord with human nature. The Holy Father does not in any way think the use of condoms is a part of the solution to reducing the risk of AIDs. As he explicitly states, the true solution involves “humanizing sexuality.”
Anyone having sex that threatens to transmit HIV needs to grow in moral discernment. This is why Benedict focused on a “first step” in moral growth. The Church is always going to be focused on moving people away from immoral acts towards love of Jesus, virtue, and holiness. We can say that the Holy Father clearly did not want to make a point about condoms, but wants to talk about growth in a moral sense, which should be a growth towards Jesus.
So is the Holy Father saying it is morally good for male prostitutes to use condoms? The Holy Father is not articulating a teaching of the Church about whether or not the use of a condom reduces the amount of evil in a homosexual sexual act that threatens to transmit HIV. The Church has no formal teaching about how to reduce the evil of intrinsically immoral action. We must note that what is intrinsically wrong in a homosexual sexual act in which a condom is used is not the moral wrong of contraception but the homosexual act itself. In the case of homosexual sexual activity, a condom does not act as a contraceptive; it is not possible for homosexuals to contracept since their sexual activity has no procreative power that can be thwarted. But the Holy Father is not making a point about whether the use of a condom is contraceptive or even whether it reduces the evil of a homosexual sexual act; again, he is speaking about the psychological state of some who might use condoms. The intention behind the use of the condom (the desire not to harm another) may indicate some growth in a sense of moral responsibility.
UPDATE
Well, the damage has been done. Listening to RTE radio news this morning on the way to 10am Mass in one of my chapels of ease, I hear from the news reader that Pope Benedict has allowed the use of condoms in certain exceptional circumstances. That is the message that is being broadcast throughout Ireland today.
More good online articles: this time from CatholicVote.org: Thomas Peters and Matt Bowman. Fr Finigan laments L'Osservatore Romano's breach of the embrago on the Seewald book.
UPDATE 2
Damian Thompson is sticking by his guns. His position: "Like it or not, the Holy Father made it clear that the use of condoms is sometimes permissible to stop the spread of the virus". Fr Lombardi in an official statement contradicts Damian's view.
UPDATE 2
Damian Thompson is sticking by his guns. His position: "Like it or not, the Holy Father made it clear that the use of condoms is sometimes permissible to stop the spread of the virus". Fr Lombardi in an official statement contradicts Damian's view.
No comments:
Post a Comment